In this post, Lauren Dixon examines arguments by Sullivan, Pickard, and Pearce on epistemic injustice and nonsuicidal self-injury in healthcare. Lauren argues that the notion of epistemic injustice is useful for patient care and clinician education but that harm minimisation techniques are not the way forward. Lauren is a current MSc student at the Institute for Mental Health , University of Birmingham. Her research interests include childhood well-being, bullying risk/protective factors, special educational needs and mental health advocacy. NSSI (non-suicidal self-injury) “ refers to the direct and deliberate destruction of one's own body tissue in the absence of lethal intent .” Epistemic injustice (a notion developed by Fricker, 2007 ) can be encompassed as failing to recognise a person as a ‘knower’ based on preconceived, and often incorrect ideas, about their identity. Fricker argues that there are two types of epistemic injustice: Testimonial Injustice (TI) and Her...
A blog at the intersection of philosophy, psychology, and mental health