Skip to main content

Ellen White on OCD

Ellen White at the 2014 Mind Media Awards
Our new feature is a series of posts by experts by experience to be published on the last Monday of each month. Last month we had Roberta Payne who wrote about schizophrenia and "outsider art".

This month, we are delighted to host Ellen White who was recently awarded the 2014 Mind Media Award as Top Blogger. In her influential and inspirational blog, Ellen writes about the positive and negative effects of OCD and depression on her life, and challenges public attitudes towards mental illness. You can also follow her on Twitter.

Suffering from a mental health condition can be for the most part extremely distressing. An everyday battle with our minds. Not knowing what to believe, what not to believe, feeling like your own mind is working against you. However, living with a mental health condition can often go hand in hand with educating ourselves about the conditions we are suffering with and mental health in general. To recover from a mental illness, we first must understand our condition. This can often lead to people with mental health conditions being a lot more understanding of other people’s struggles. Whether that be struggling with the same mental health condition, or just struggling in general. We can almost put ourselves in the positions of others more easily.

I suffer from Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder and depression. They have both impacted my daily life since about the age of 9. Whilst this has brought about many hardships in my life, it has also allowed me to grow tremendously as a person. In knowledge and in strength, particularly surrounding the topic of mental health. Through CBT I have learnt about tackling intrusive thoughts, irrational beliefs and controlling anxiety. All at the time directed at battling my OCD, but I’ve found, benefiting me in everyday life too. Even when I have intrusive thoughts not even regarding OCD beliefs (as I have found out also through CBT, that everyone experiences intrusive thoughts. It’s a common thing! It’s how you handle the thoughts that matter) I now know how to cope with them. For example around exam time, when commonly stress levels are high and intrusive thoughts can arise. Instead of, like previous years, letting myself become prisoner to the intrusive thoughts; “I’m going to fail this exam”   or “I’m never going to get anywhere in life”. Instead I am able to recognise them as negative and unhelpful and use the techniques I have learnt, to just let them pass. They’re just intrusive thoughts, not fact. This in turn has definitely made exam time a lot less stressful.

Also, during the process of recovering from OCD and depression, I have been investigating different ways of keeping myself active and engaged. As I know that if I just sit around the house, my mood can seriously drop. Often, with the constant anxiety that OCD gives me every day, I often need to find a way to let it out. Sport has been a healthy way of doing that. I’ve found, because I have added anxiety that I hate and just want to get rid of, I’m a lot more motivated during my running and cycling. I almost feel like having suffered from depression to the point where I wasn’t going out or doing any of the sporting activities that I used to love and now finally beginning to enjoy them and participate in them again, has really given me so much more motivation than I ever thought I had the potential of having. I feel like without having gone through the struggle of OCD and depression, I would've never gained this true motivation for sports and also being able to gain so many necessary life skills that I may not have learnt until later on in life.

Popular posts from this blog

Delusions in the DSM 5

This post is by Lisa Bortolotti. How has the definition of delusions changed in the DSM 5? Here are some first impressions. In the DSM-IV (Glossary) delusions were defined as follows: Delusion. A false belief based on incorrect inference about external reality that is firmly sustained despite what almost everyone else believes and despite what constitutes incontrovertible and obvious proof or evidence to the contrary. The belief is not one ordinarily accepted by other members of the person's culture or subculture (e.g., it is not an article of religious faith). When a false belief involves a value judgment, it is regarded as a delusion only when the judgment is so extreme as to defy credibility.

Rationalization: Why your intelligence, vigilance and expertise probably don't protect you

Today's post is by Jonathan Ellis , Associate Professor of Philosophy and Director of the Center for Public Philosophy at the University of California, Santa Cruz, and Eric Schwitzgebel , Professor of Philosophy at the University of California, Riverside. This is the first in a two-part contribution on their paper "Rationalization in Moral and Philosophical thought" in Moral Inferences , eds. J. F. Bonnefon and B. Trémolière (Psychology Press, 2017). We’ve all been there. You’re arguing with someone – about politics, or a policy at work, or about whose turn it is to do the dishes – and they keep finding all kinds of self-serving justifications for their view. When one of their arguments is defeated, rather than rethinking their position they just leap to another argument, then maybe another. They’re rationalizing –coming up with convenient defenses for what they want to believe, rather than responding even-handedly to the points you're making. Yo

A co-citation analysis of cross-disciplinarity in the empirically-informed philosophy of mind

Today's post is by  Karen Yan (National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University) on her recent paper (co-authored with Chuan-Ya Liao), " A co-citation analysis of cross-disciplinarity in the empirically-informed philosophy of mind " ( Synthese 2023). Karen Yan What drives us to write this paper is our curiosity about what it means when philosophers of mind claim their works are informed by empirical evidence and how to assess this quality of empirically-informedness. Building on Knobe’s (2015) quantitative metaphilosophical analyses of empirically-informed philosophy of mind (EIPM), we investigated further how empirically-informed philosophers rely on empirical research and what metaphilosophical lessons to draw from our empirical results.  We utilize scientometric tools and categorization analysis to provide an empirically reliable description of EIPM. Our methodological novelty lies in integrating the co-citation analysis tool with the conceptual resources from the philosoph