Skip to main content

Young People and Mental Health


Today's post is by Sophie (pictured above), a Journalism student who has health anxiety, social anxiety and OCD. Sophie writes several blogs, and is on Twitter. The post you can read here is an extract from a longer post previously published in The Musings of a Journalism Student on 19th July 2015. We repost it on our blog with her permission, for our series of posts by experts-by-experience.

I recently watched a documentary called Kids in Crisis which featured young children and teenagers who had mental health problems. These children had a formal diagnosis. I’ve also had a family member recently diagnosed with reactive depression, who is merely a young person themselves. That is a strong diagnosis to place on someone so young.

Many clinicians are reluctant to place such a permanent diagnosis on young people but alas many young people do have a formal diagnosis. A label that will stick to them for life. If you’ve been reading my blog for a while you’ll know that I was recently diagnosed with anxiety and OCD, if you haven’t well now you know! I’m always going to have these disorders. They are part of me, but they do not make up my identity as such. They aren’t a positive label to have. Being labelled with a mental health problem isn’t good at all. But we can use it to our advantage. Something not many people see.

Today mental health problems still have a stigma attached to them. Depression, anxiety, OCD, bipolar disorder, borderline personality disorder, schizophrenia, anorexia, bulimia… every mental health problem has a stigma. Not every physical health problem does. I feel like today’s generation who have been placed in the “persons who are mentally unwell” box are going to be faced with a lot of stigma.

I know that I’ve been experiencing my current symptoms since the age of 14, but I never thought anything of it. I used to collect bottle tops, worry if I lost something to the point where I’d have a panic attack and so much more. I had low confidence too. I thought this was normal. I thought I had Asperger’s Syndrome at one point after researching, but ignored it, mainly because of the stigma attached to learning difficulties.

I never let the stuff that was going on in my head show. At least I tried not to. It was difficult but I made it through until I was triggered by an event in college which made things spiral. This is when the stigma hit me head on. I felt judged from that point onwards at the age of 19. Stigma from everywhere I turned. That’s why I didn’t get a formal diagnosis till now.

Concerned parents take their children to the doctors and they get a mental health diagnosis. Some doctors take the chance and wait until the child is older. Young people have more agency in this decision. They can decide whether to approach the health sector. They can’t easily be forced unless they are compelled to do so by the Mental Health Act. Yet no one has a choice whether stigma hits them. At all.

Stigma is all around us. We have seen it in the media recently. There is a real lack of understanding around mental health problems. People think that OCD is just about wanting to clean or having things in order. There are different types of OCD. There are different types of anxiety, different types of depression. Mental health problems affect us in different ways and people don’t see that. We are placed into a strict box that I personally find it hard to get out of. I don’t have a problem with cleaning, in fact I probably have one of the messiest rooms ever! I don’t just worry about everything. I worry about specific things. People don’t understand.

I feel lucky that I’ve been able to do some things in life before my formal diagnosis. I had the choice. My anxiety and OCD has just been placed on my record. I chose to have it on there. Children don’t have that option unless they are deemed able to understand the consequences. The consequences of what is going on in their mind. I’ve been able to hold down jobs, been able to go to college and start university.

I fear that for people with a mental health diagnosis on their record that they may feel that these things aren’t possible for them. They are possible, you just have to fight to prove it. It frightens me to think that just because I and many other young people have a mental health problem or problems, that we are treated unequally because of a lack of understanding. The mind and body are connected. So why can’t mental health problems be treated the same as physical health problems? Physical health can be managed as well as mental health problems. They may never go away but we can minimise the effect that they have on us.

Necessary things can be done for people with physical health problems and disabilities although of course there is still stigma, but for those with mental health problems this isn’t so easy, which is why I think there is a reluctancy. People don’t know what to do, how to react, how to feel about someone with anxiety or OCD or any other mental health problem. It scares me to think of my family member, that they will have to go through this. They will have to break down the walls that I’m having to, right now. That they will have to fight to get what they want out of life.

I won’t let my mental health problems stop me. EVER. I want to be a journalist, I want to work in the political arena. I want to do so many things. I am determined to do things and I won’t let anything get in the way. I may be stubborn but for good reason. I will always think of my health, but my passion and my drive is just as important to me. Even though my mental health will get in the way sometimes, I will not let it win entirely. Before I had my mental health problems, I could function “normally” as society would say. I can still function well but sometimes my anxiety and OCD get in the way and mess with my head.

I also want to point out the fact that being diagnosed with a mental health problem or problems is not a sign of weakness. It shows that you have strength to recognise your feelings and have been able to recognise that the thoughts or symptoms are not “normal” for you. Everyone has a different normal, remember that. It is only society that places the line between normal and abnormal.

Popular posts from this blog

Delusions in the DSM 5

This post is by Lisa Bortolotti. How has the definition of delusions changed in the DSM 5? Here are some first impressions. In the DSM-IV (Glossary) delusions were defined as follows: Delusion. A false belief based on incorrect inference about external reality that is firmly sustained despite what almost everyone else believes and despite what constitutes incontrovertible and obvious proof or evidence to the contrary. The belief is not one ordinarily accepted by other members of the person's culture or subculture (e.g., it is not an article of religious faith). When a false belief involves a value judgment, it is regarded as a delusion only when the judgment is so extreme as to defy credibility.

Rationalization: Why your intelligence, vigilance and expertise probably don't protect you

Today's post is by Jonathan Ellis , Associate Professor of Philosophy and Director of the Center for Public Philosophy at the University of California, Santa Cruz, and Eric Schwitzgebel , Professor of Philosophy at the University of California, Riverside. This is the first in a two-part contribution on their paper "Rationalization in Moral and Philosophical thought" in Moral Inferences , eds. J. F. Bonnefon and B. Trémolière (Psychology Press, 2017). We’ve all been there. You’re arguing with someone – about politics, or a policy at work, or about whose turn it is to do the dishes – and they keep finding all kinds of self-serving justifications for their view. When one of their arguments is defeated, rather than rethinking their position they just leap to another argument, then maybe another. They’re rationalizing –coming up with convenient defenses for what they want to believe, rather than responding even-handedly to the points you're making. Yo...

A co-citation analysis of cross-disciplinarity in the empirically-informed philosophy of mind

Today's post is by  Karen Yan (National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University) on her recent paper (co-authored with Chuan-Ya Liao), " A co-citation analysis of cross-disciplinarity in the empirically-informed philosophy of mind " ( Synthese 2023). Karen Yan What drives us to write this paper is our curiosity about what it means when philosophers of mind claim their works are informed by empirical evidence and how to assess this quality of empirically-informedness. Building on Knobe’s (2015) quantitative metaphilosophical analyses of empirically-informed philosophy of mind (EIPM), we investigated further how empirically-informed philosophers rely on empirical research and what metaphilosophical lessons to draw from our empirical results.  We utilize scientometric tools and categorization analysis to provide an empirically reliable description of EIPM. Our methodological novelty lies in integrating the co-citation analysis tool with the conceptual resources from the philosoph...