Skip to main content

Social Media and Youth Mental Health

On 14th November there was an interesting conference at the Royal Society of Medicine on the effects of social media on mental health.

Mary Aiken (University of College Dublin) discussed the Cyber Effect, her book which addresses the risks of social media on young people (cover below). Cyber space is a space and we need to consider the impact of it on vulnerable populations such as teens. We need to factor in developmental aspects (at what age should parents let children have a smartphone?). We need to recognise the continuous evolution of behaviour and as experts we need to drive policy initiatives and develop guidelines for parents and educators.




Jon Goldin (Great Ormond Street Hospital) talked about the risks and benefits of social media for young people. Children like using social media for different reasons: they use it for communication, to express themselves, to gain confidence, for popularity, for entertainment, to develop a sense of belonging, to receive information. Social media is risky for adolescents: it may cause a lack of sleep; due to anonymity, it encourages bad behaviour such as cyberbullying; it may facilitate gambling; and it can be used to research suicide methodology.




The worrying data suggest a correlation between social media use and mental health issues. There can be advantages to the use of social media such as ready availability of information, but the reasons to worry are greater than the reasons to be optimistic unless measures are taken to regulate the use of social media. One worry concerns anorexia nervosa: whereas some sources offer support there are sites inviting people to be anorexic and offering tips to avoid food. Another worry concerns child protection such as preventing grooming and sexting.

What are the possible solutions to these problems? There needs to be more education (sex education and internet security in schools). There needs to be an acknowledgement that social media has good effects, an open discussion about it with adolescents. Social media cannot be banned entirely but there needs to be boundaries, such as no more than two hours of social media a day and no social media in the bedroom after a certain time.

The next talk was about support for gender dysphoria, and was presented by Jan Sampson from the organisation called Mermaids UK (logo below). Jan talked about the stories of Jackie, a trans girl who was severely abused in high school and made seven suicide attempts. Jan was very clear that social media can be positive and negative: positives include allowing people to get support and information, negatives include the fact that online abuse makes it the case that there is no safe space for the person who is the victim of abuse.






The next two talks were about grooming. Heather Carr (picture below) from Child Exploitation and Online Protection described the process offenders and children go through when they come into contact. The first stage of grooming is to gain trust and friendship trying to find areas of common interest and showing empathy. Then the offender will conduct a risk assessment, checking who is around the child. The following step is to ask the child to share things and once the child shares content, the offender will blackmail the child. "If you tell someone, or if you don't do what I tell you, then I will share those embarrassing  images of yourself".




Young people may want to be liked and understood and may have a natural sexual curiosity. So they are especially vulnerable to offenders who flatter, send gifts, and help them online by giving them tips on a gaming platform or "likes" to their online content. The impact of online sexual abuse is very significant: it causes shame, guilt, fear, anxiety, mistrust; it makes children feel deceived, engage in self-harm; and may also turn into later relationship difficulties.

Simone Benhayon (picture below) from All Rise Say No to Cyber Abuse shared her own experience of being abused online as a teenager and as an adult. She wanted to know more about the phenomenon and she discovered that online abuse is not confined to young people but can affect anybody. She argued that abuse is abuse, whether online or offline, and that it is not the medium that is responsible for the harm done, but it is the people who abuse. Of course social media can be part of the problem, but the need is to educate adults to interact with each other differently. The key is not to take away social media from children but to show them how to relate to social media and to treat each other with decency and respect.




Popular posts from this blog

Delusions in the DSM 5

This post is by Lisa Bortolotti. How has the definition of delusions changed in the DSM 5? Here are some first impressions. In the DSM-IV (Glossary) delusions were defined as follows: Delusion. A false belief based on incorrect inference about external reality that is firmly sustained despite what almost everyone else believes and despite what constitutes incontrovertible and obvious proof or evidence to the contrary. The belief is not one ordinarily accepted by other members of the person's culture or subculture (e.g., it is not an article of religious faith). When a false belief involves a value judgment, it is regarded as a delusion only when the judgment is so extreme as to defy credibility.

Rationalization: Why your intelligence, vigilance and expertise probably don't protect you

Today's post is by Jonathan Ellis , Associate Professor of Philosophy and Director of the Center for Public Philosophy at the University of California, Santa Cruz, and Eric Schwitzgebel , Professor of Philosophy at the University of California, Riverside. This is the first in a two-part contribution on their paper "Rationalization in Moral and Philosophical thought" in Moral Inferences , eds. J. F. Bonnefon and B. Trémolière (Psychology Press, 2017). We’ve all been there. You’re arguing with someone – about politics, or a policy at work, or about whose turn it is to do the dishes – and they keep finding all kinds of self-serving justifications for their view. When one of their arguments is defeated, rather than rethinking their position they just leap to another argument, then maybe another. They’re rationalizing –coming up with convenient defenses for what they want to believe, rather than responding even-handedly to the points you're making. Yo...

A co-citation analysis of cross-disciplinarity in the empirically-informed philosophy of mind

Today's post is by  Karen Yan (National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University) on her recent paper (co-authored with Chuan-Ya Liao), " A co-citation analysis of cross-disciplinarity in the empirically-informed philosophy of mind " ( Synthese 2023). Karen Yan What drives us to write this paper is our curiosity about what it means when philosophers of mind claim their works are informed by empirical evidence and how to assess this quality of empirically-informedness. Building on Knobe’s (2015) quantitative metaphilosophical analyses of empirically-informed philosophy of mind (EIPM), we investigated further how empirically-informed philosophers rely on empirical research and what metaphilosophical lessons to draw from our empirical results.  We utilize scientometric tools and categorization analysis to provide an empirically reliable description of EIPM. Our methodological novelty lies in integrating the co-citation analysis tool with the conceptual resources from the philosoph...