Aimee Wilson on BPD

Aimee Wilson

This post is part of our series of accounts by experts by experience. Roberta Payne wrote about schizophrenia and outsider art in December, and Ellen White about OCD in January. Today Aimee Wilson tells us about BPD.

Hi! I am Aimee and I blog over on www.imnotdisordered.blogspot.co.uk. I’m currently in recovery from Borderline Personality Disorder, after a six year long battle with the illness and a two year admission in a specialist hospital. When Lisa emailed me asking if I would write a post about the positive aspects of the things that have been deemed symptoms of BPD, I was intrigued. I guess, naturally, I’d only ever moaned and ranted about these things especially when they are the things that cause me to be hospitalised or to self-harm and attempt suicide.

So, to think of positives sounded like a good challenge.

When I was diagnosed with BPD, the diagnostic criteria were to have at least five of nine possible symptoms, and it was widely agreed by professionals that I had all nine. So, I will break this post up into each symptom and it’s positives:

Unstable mood: The depths of depression make me all the more grateful for my happiness and good moods. It means I make the most of the time when I feel good by taking all of the opportunities that come my way.

Stress-related hallucinations: Seeing rabbits and hearing voices, has given me empathy for those who have psychosis. I am also in a better position with my new job as an Independent Skills Developer for Blind Veterans UK because often those with limited sight, see things which are not there as their brain powers to fill in the gaps.

Self-damaging behaviour: My cuts and the subsequent scars, have allowed others to have a tiny glimpse into my pain.

Impulsivity: Doing positive things on impulse has led to some amazing experiences, and doing negative things, has taught me lessons.

Unstable relationships: Have meant that the friendships I make and the relationships I maintain, mean that much more to me and the effort I choose to put into them, makes them that bit more special.

Feelings of emptiness: Have taught me not to rely on others to feel ‘complete.’ It is hand-made by yourself.

Fear of abandonment: Have meant that I have protected myself against potentially devastating blows when a relationship has ended or the person has died.

Unstable sense of self: This, has resulted in me going on an incredibly powerful ‘journey’ to learn who I am and what my values are. Making me a stronger person when my morals or actions are questioned.

Intense anger: When used in a positive way, has given me incredible physical strength in times of need and a determination to no longer be my abuser’s ‘victim.’

P.S. I think it’s worth mentioning that I am perhaps able to see these positives because I am in recovery, and so, if you have BPD and are reading this; I’m not surprised if you’re sat there thinking ‘how the hell can this girl find anything good in this illness?’ Because, a while ago; I would’ve thought the same thing if confronted with this post! My point is, you’ll get there. Please keep going and come through the other side to see the positives.

Delusions in the DSM 5

This post is by Lisa Bortolotti. How has the definition of delusions changed in the DSM 5? Here are some first impressions. In the DSM-IV (Glossary) delusions were defined as follows: Delusion. A false belief based on incorrect inference about external reality that is firmly sustained despite what almost everyone else believes and despite what constitutes incontrovertible and obvious proof or evidence to the contrary. The belief is not one ordinarily accepted by other members of the person's culture or subculture (e.g., it is not an article of religious faith). When a false belief involves a value judgment, it is regarded as a delusion only when the judgment is so extreme as to defy credibility.

Rationalization: Why your intelligence, vigilance and expertise probably don't protect you

Today's post is by Jonathan Ellis , Associate Professor of Philosophy and Director of the Center for Public Philosophy at the University of California, Santa Cruz, and Eric Schwitzgebel , Professor of Philosophy at the University of California, Riverside. This is the first in a two-part contribution on their paper "Rationalization in Moral and Philosophical thought" in Moral Inferences , eds. J. F. Bonnefon and B. Trémolière (Psychology Press, 2017). We’ve all been there. You’re arguing with someone – about politics, or a policy at work, or about whose turn it is to do the dishes – and they keep finding all kinds of self-serving justifications for their view. When one of their arguments is defeated, rather than rethinking their position they just leap to another argument, then maybe another. They’re rationalizing –coming up with convenient defenses for what they want to believe, rather than responding even-handedly to the points you're making. Yo...

A co-citation analysis of cross-disciplinarity in the empirically-informed philosophy of mind

Today's post is by Karen Yan (National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University) on her recent paper (co-authored with Chuan-Ya Liao), " A co-citation analysis of cross-disciplinarity in the empirically-informed philosophy of mind " ( Synthese 2023). Karen Yan What drives us to write this paper is our curiosity about what it means when philosophers of mind claim their works are informed by empirical evidence and how to assess this quality of empirically-informedness. Building on Knobe’s (2015) quantitative metaphilosophical analyses of empirically-informed philosophy of mind (EIPM), we investigated further how empirically-informed philosophers rely on empirical research and what metaphilosophical lessons to draw from our empirical results. We utilize scientometric tools and categorization analysis to provide an empirically reliable description of EIPM. Our methodological novelty lies in integrating the co-citation analysis tool with the conceptual resources from the philosoph...

Imperfect Cognitions

Search This Blog