Skip to main content

Too Mad to Be True III

This post is by Helene Cæcilie Mørck (MA), academic, expert by experience and choreographer, who recently attended and talked at Too Mad to Be True III: Paradoxes of Madness, held on October 30–31, 2024, at the Dr. Guislain Museum in Ghent, Belgium. The conference was organised by Jasper Feyaerts (Ghent University), Bart Marius (Director of the Dr. Guislain Museum), and Wouter Kusters (Foundation for Psychiatry & Philosophy). 


Opening speech by Jasper Feyaerts (Ghent University)

This year’s theme explored the notion of contradiction and paradox in madness, philosophy, and related fields. With over 60 speakers, including five keynote presenters, the conference offered a remarkable diversity of perspectives that challenged conventional understandings of madness. Despite the breadth of content and the tight two-day schedule, the experience was intense, deeply enriching, and empowering. 

Many speakers lived with or had personal experiences of madness, bringing an invaluable first-hand dimension to their insights. Their contributions spanned a variety of disciplines, including philosophy, psychiatry, the arts such as music, choreography, filmmaking, writing, and cartooning to mention a few, Mad Studies, Mad activism, queer and trans studies, psychology, social sciences, medical anthropology, and independent voices. This multidisciplinary and lived-experience-driven approach lent the conference a unique vibrancy and authenticity.

This quote from Sofia Jeppsson’s presentation encapsulates a recurring thread that ran through many of the talks: “Psychosis patients make holes in reality.” Viewed through a Mad perspective, this idea invites us to reconsider madness as a transformative force—one that critiques, reshapes, and interacts with the boundaries of what we call "reality." Far from being purely destructive, psychosis and other forms of madness can disrupt stagnant or rigid structures, creating opportunities for creativity and transformation. 

These "holes" in reality can be seen as openings—gaps through which new ways of understanding, perceiving, and imagining might emerge. Experiencing madness, as many of the speakers demonstrated, can offer profound insights and perspectives that are inaccessible to others. Here is a glimpse of some of the talks the speakers presented.


Julia MacIntosh’s talk, "Learning to Love Mad Reality"


Julia MacIntosh’s talk, From “and/or” to “both/and” – Learning to Love Mad Reality, explored how madness intertwines with consensual reality. She emphasised, “Madness isn’t another realm; it is deeply intertwined with consensual reality,” challenging the binary view that separates the two. 

Michael Dickson, in his presentation Living with the Paradox of Delusion, framed certain delusions as generating paradoxes. He argued that individuals experiencing delusions often have good reasons to hold them, and advocated for adopting intellectual humility, which involves grounding rationality in accepting both the delusion and its denial. 

In Sabina Wantoch's contribution, The Ouroboros of Mad Experience and the Neoliberal University, which was a performative presentation combining story-telling and poetry, they explored the paradoxes with the experience of writing a PhD on madness, whilst trained in and in constant struggle with analytic philosophy, at the neoliberal university. 

In Lorna Collins' presentation, Being Psychotic: Madness as Vulnerability and Power, she talked about her lived experiences of having organic psychosis which leads her to have continuous hallucinations. She spoke of her infinite creativity and how her hallucinations enabled rather than disabled her, even when they were violent and destructive.

Labels:

Popular posts from this blog

Delusions in the DSM 5

This post is by Lisa Bortolotti. How has the definition of delusions changed in the DSM 5? Here are some first impressions. In the DSM-IV (Glossary) delusions were defined as follows: Delusion. A false belief based on incorrect inference about external reality that is firmly sustained despite what almost everyone else believes and despite what constitutes incontrovertible and obvious proof or evidence to the contrary. The belief is not one ordinarily accepted by other members of the person's culture or subculture (e.g., it is not an article of religious faith). When a false belief involves a value judgment, it is regarded as a delusion only when the judgment is so extreme as to defy credibility.
Read more

Motivated Reasoning in Science

Today's post is by Josh May (University of Alabama, Birmingham). In this post, he talks about one of his papers published in Synthese and entitled " Bias in Science ". Josh May Much discussion of the replication crisis in science has focused on the social sciences, particularly psychology. A common narrative is that the social sciences are particularly susceptible to powerful biases, such as moral and political ideology. I argue instead for a parity thesis: all areas of science are subject to bias, through the general psychological mechanism of motivated reasoning . This provides a unified framework for understanding how values influence the entire scientific enterprise. The scientific process involves numerous decisions that can be influenced by one's values--including moral, political, and prudential values--which manifest as goals or motivations. A researcher wants badly, say, to publish in a prestigious journal in order to either advance her career or maintain ...
Read more

Models of Madness

In today's post John Read  (in the picture above) presents the recent book he co-authored with Jacqui Dillon , titled Models of Madness: Psychological, Social and Biological Approaches to Psychosis. My name is John Read. After 20 years working as a Clinical Psychologist and manager of mental health services in the UK and the USA, mostly with people experiencing psychosis, I joined the University of Auckland, New Zealand, in 1994. There I published over 100 papers in research journals, primarily on the relationship between adverse life events (e.g., child abuse/neglect, poverty etc.) and psychosis. I also research the negative effects of bio-genetic causal explanations on prejudice, and the role of the pharmaceutical industry in mental health. In February I moved to Melbourne and I now work at Swinburne University of Technology.  I am on the on the Executive Committee of the International Society for Psychological and Social Approaches to Psychosis and am the Editor...
Read more