Skip to main content

Thoughtful

This post is by Grace Lockrobin, Co-director of Thoughtful.


Resources for Philosophy for Children


Over the past few years, the charity established in 1992 as SAPERE, has undergone a metamorphosis. Our members and stakeholders agreed that we needed a new name that captures our commitment to the kind of dialogue that takes ideas seriously and treats interlocutors sensitively. In short, thoughtful dialogue. It turns out that our new name was staring us in the face.

We are pleased to share Thoughtful’s new website, a refreshed digital space that we hope better articulates (and facilitates) our work in Philosophy for Children and Communities (P4C). 


Thoughtful new website


Thoughtful has spent more than three decades supporting philosophical enquiry in schools and communities across the United Kingdom. The new site offers a clearer and more welcoming way to explore that work, while expressing the same mission and vision.

At the centre of Thoughtful’s approach is a simple but striking idea: that philosophical enquiry matters, not only within academic contexts but as part of everyday learning and life. The website reflects this by presenting enquiry as something that can be practised at any age and stage, and in any place, rather than as a specialised activity confined to higher education. 

Visitors to the new site can explore our courses, projects and programmes, via a navigation that makes it easier to see how different elements of P4C connect and are mutually reinforcing. The resources library (the new home for P4C.com) is particularly useful for educators, providing a curated collection of materials designed to support enquiry across a range of subjects and age groups.

The site also opens out onto a wider intellectual and social context via our blog which draws attention to the role of dialogue in fostering thoughtful, collaborative forms of engagement, and connects this to broader questions about education and participation in civic life. You’ll notice our latest post announces Thoughtful as the winner of the inaugural ‘Service to UK Philosophy’ prize from the British Philosophical Association.


A young man engaged in a philosophical discussion


Overall, the redesign is not simply a matter of presentation. It is a way of bringing Thoughtful’s work into a more accessible and coherent form. For educators, researchers, and anyone interested in dialogue, enquiry and education, the new Thoughtful website offers a useful starting point. It encourages visitors not only to explore what is available, but to take part in a wider community of enquiry.

We encourage you to take a look.


Popular posts from this blog

Delusions in the DSM 5

This post is by Lisa Bortolotti. How has the definition of delusions changed in the DSM 5? Here are some first impressions. In the DSM-IV (Glossary) delusions were defined as follows: Delusion. A false belief based on incorrect inference about external reality that is firmly sustained despite what almost everyone else believes and despite what constitutes incontrovertible and obvious proof or evidence to the contrary. The belief is not one ordinarily accepted by other members of the person's culture or subculture (e.g., it is not an article of religious faith). When a false belief involves a value judgment, it is regarded as a delusion only when the judgment is so extreme as to defy credibility.

Motivated Reasoning in Science

Today's post is by Josh May (University of Alabama, Birmingham). In this post, he talks about one of his papers published in Synthese and entitled " Bias in Science ". Josh May Much discussion of the replication crisis in science has focused on the social sciences, particularly psychology. A common narrative is that the social sciences are particularly susceptible to powerful biases, such as moral and political ideology. I argue instead for a parity thesis: all areas of science are subject to bias, through the general psychological mechanism of motivated reasoning . This provides a unified framework for understanding how values influence the entire scientific enterprise. The scientific process involves numerous decisions that can be influenced by one's values--including moral, political, and prudential values--which manifest as goals or motivations. A researcher wants badly, say, to publish in a prestigious journal in order to either advance her career or maintain ...

Models of Madness

In today's post John Read  (in the picture above) presents the recent book he co-authored with Jacqui Dillon , titled Models of Madness: Psychological, Social and Biological Approaches to Psychosis. My name is John Read. After 20 years working as a Clinical Psychologist and manager of mental health services in the UK and the USA, mostly with people experiencing psychosis, I joined the University of Auckland, New Zealand, in 1994. There I published over 100 papers in research journals, primarily on the relationship between adverse life events (e.g., child abuse/neglect, poverty etc.) and psychosis. I also research the negative effects of bio-genetic causal explanations on prejudice, and the role of the pharmaceutical industry in mental health. In February I moved to Melbourne and I now work at Swinburne University of Technology.  I am on the on the Executive Committee of the International Society for Psychological and Social Approaches to Psychosis and am the Editor...